The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat, by Oliver Sacks

Due to Oliver Sacks’ presence in the consciousness of the general population, largely because his book, Awakenings, and the film that followed, I expected The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat to be written for the layman. I was mistaken.

To get the most from this book, the reader needs a grounding, or at least rudimentary exposure, to neurology and psychiatry. Sacks relays case histories of twenty of his patients largely deep in the weeds medical jargon, its practices, theories, and hypotheses, which had me running to the internet far too often for comfort. (Though I did learn some new terminology). For about three quarters of the book I felt as though I was reading a foreign language. Yet I soldiered on and am glad that I did. Some of the pathologies that Sacks discusses are familiar (Tourette’s syndrome, amnesia) while others are less well-known to the average reader (agnosia, mnemonist). Many of the references made my head spin: A. R. Luria’s Higher Cortical Functions of Man, S. E. Jelliffe’s Psychopathology of Forced Movements and Oculogyric Crises of Lethargic Encephalitis, D. Bear’s “Temporal-lobe epilepsy: a syndrome of sensory-limbic hyperconnection.”

The saving grace of this book is Sacks deep compassion and empathy for his patients. Recognizing that studying them in a clinical setting, where they are examined and tested in unnatural and uncomfortable circumstances, does not give the clinician a full picture, he visits them in their homes. Observing his patients function as normally as their maladies allow, he is better able to treat them. He believes that clinical case histories

tell us nothing about the individual and his history; they convey nothing of the person, and the experience of the person, as he faces, and struggles to survive, his disease. There is no ‘subject’ in a narrow case history; modern case histories allude to the subject in a cursory phrase (‘a trisomic albino female of 21’), which could as well apply to a rat…To restore the human subject at the centre – – the suffering, afflicted, fighting, human subject – – we must deepen a case history to a narrative tale; only then do we have a ‘who’ as well as a ‘what…’

Sacks possesses the humility to accept the advice and counsel of the Sister who works closely with his hospital patients, and to admit that he and his fellow physicians make mistakes. He says that “[they] paid far too much attention to the defects of our patients…and far too little to what was intact or preserved.”

Sacks is at his best when he tells the patients’ story, acknowledges their full humanity, and how he adjusts his perceptions and changes course. Just one example of many: “Rebecca,” who is mentally challenged with a very low IQ, flounders in workshops and classes, (“…what we did was to drive [patients] full-tilt upon their limitations…”) and instead enrolled her in a special theater group, in which she flourished. “She loved this – – it composed her; she did amazingly well: she became a complete person, poised, fluent, with style, in each role.”

Is it worth reading such a difficult book for these sporadic understandable passages?
Absolutely.

Advertisement

About connieciampanelli

I am the administrator of this page on behalf of our book club. I retired from La Salle Academy after serving as a secretary in The Admission and School/College Counseling offices to a total of fourteen years. A lifelong avid reader with a B.A. in Liberal Arts, Major in English, I read as I breathe, meaning reading is like the oxygen that keeps me alive.
This entry was posted in Reviews. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat, by Oliver Sacks

  1. Leslie Martinelli says:

    I first read that book about 20 years ago – (it came out in the 80s, I think)!
    I, too, enjoyed the book and the personalization that Sacks gave to his patients.
    We need more doctors like that today!

    Liked by 1 person

    • connieciampanelli says:

      Leslie, many of the essays were from as far back as 1970. The copy I have was a 1986 re-release with postscripts to each story.
      I’m sure that you had an easier time with the medical technicalities than I did! From its tone, I believe that he was addressing other professionals.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.